نوع مقاله : عوامل عفونی - بیماریها
نویسندگان
1 گروه میکروبشناسی و ایمنی شناسی، دانشکدة دامپزشکی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 گروه مامایی، دانشکدة دامپزشکی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 گروه پاتوبیولوژی، دانشکدة دامپزشکی دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
Lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) is a double-stranded DNA virus that belongs to the genus Capripoxvirus of the Poxviridae family. The LSDV is one of the major poxviral diseases that cause considerable economic damages because of reduced milk production, increased abortion rates, diminished weight gain, elevated susce-ptibility to secondary bacterial infections, and high mortality (MacLachlan and Dubovi, 2017). Clinical signs of LSDV in cattle are fever and nodular skin lesions that can spread on the body. Generalized lymphadenitis and edema of the limbs may also occur.
The LSDV was first recognized in 1929 in diverse animals in Zambia and other African countries (Tuppurainen and Oura, 2012). The LSDV was observed in the Middle East in 1989, and since then, several outbreaks have occurred, and there is a risk of LSDV becoming endemic in some countries in the region (Oie, 2010). Before 2012, the disease was reported sporadically in the Middle East. However, the incidence of the disease has increased in many countries since 2012 (Al‐Salihi and Hassan, 2015; Ben-Gera et al., 2015; Kasem et al., 2018; Mercier et al., 2018; Sameea Yousefi et al., 2017; Şevik and Doğan, 2017). The LSDV outbreaks were reported in the northwestern provinces of Iran in 2014. The disease leads to detrimental economic effects due to animal mortality, reduced milk production, and health costs (Sameea Yousefi et al., 2017).
The results of another study showed the pres-ence of LSDVs in the northwest of Iran, which were genetically related to each other with more than 99% identity (Yousefi et al., 2018). Sameea Yousefi et al. studied the relationships between LSDVs isolated from different regions of Iran. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a high sequence similarity between LSDVs in Iran and African isolates. They suggested that LSDVs had entered Iran from Iraq (Yousefi et al., 2018).
In the present study, the diagnosis of LSD was based on clinical signs that were confirmed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Capripoxvirus infection. In the clinical examination of the cattle with LSDV, skin nodules, superficial lymph node enlargement, and loss of appetite were the most frequent symptoms. Other signs included fever, edema in various body parts, and mucosal discharge. A large number of studies have documented the same symptoms in natural (Agag et al., 1992; Body et al., 2012; El-Neweshy et al., 2013) or experimental infections (Osuagwuh et al., 2007). PCR is the common diagnostic method for this disease (Zhou et al., 2012). The P32 gene is a structural protein suitable for molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis (OIE, 2016; Tian et al., 2010). Furthermore, the P32 antigen plays an essential role in disease pathogenesis and the production of antibodies against Capripoxviruses (El-Kholy et al., 2008; Hosamani et al., 2004; Mafirakureva et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2017). In a recent study, it was reported that tracing the origin of LSDV isolates using the P32 gene could be reliable in phylogenetic studies (Mafirakureva et al., 2017).
During the onset of LSD in two cattle herds in Kurdistan, Iran in January 2020, lymph node samples were collected from dead cows and transferred to the laboratory under cold chain conditions. Phosphate-buffered saline solution and sterile homogenizer were used to prepare a homogenate of the sampled tissues (100 mg). The suspensions were centrifuged and the supernatant was collected for viral DNA extraction.
Total DNA was extracted from samples according to the instructions of the manufact-urer of the commercial extraction Kit (Sina-Clon Co., Iran).
The PCR was performed using the primers described by Ireland and Binepal (Ireland and Binepal, 1998). The primers were designed to amplify a specific segment of 192 bp. The sequences of forward and reverse primers for PCR amplification were 5´-TTTCCTGATT-TTTCTTACTAT-3´ and 5´-AAATTATATACG TAAATAAC-3´, respectively.
The PCR was carried out with a total volume of 25 μL containing 2.5 μL genomic DNA, 1 μL of each primer, 12.5 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix RED (Amplicon, Denmark), and 8 μL of distilled water. The PCR reactions were conducted under the following thermal conditions: initial denat-uration for 2 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (50 s at 94°C), primer annealing (50 s at 50°C), and strand extension (60 s at 72°C), ending with a final strand extension step for 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were visualized in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel under a UV transilluminator.
All samples were evaluated by PCR and the PCR products of positive samples were sequenced (Bioneer Co., Korea). Sequences were aligned using ClustalW pairwise alignment. Sequences of reference strains and other detected LSDVs were obtained from the NCBI database. Analysis was performed using the neighbor-joining statistical method with 1000 bootstrap replications based on the distance and phylogenetic tree of LSDVs isolates. Sequences were selected from the close strains of the virus in different countries based on location, time, and the results of genetic analysis. The sequences of identified LSDVs in this study were submitted in GenBank under the accession numbers MT050465 and MT050466.
Viral DNAs specific for LSDV were found in all samples. In the current investigation, a 192 bp fragment of the P32 gene was amplified and matched with the published articles on the P32 gene.
By sequencing the fragments of 192 bp of PCR products, the partial P32 gene was identified, which encodes the antigenic structural protein. The nucleotide alignment of the sequences showed a similarity of 42.98%-100% between the two selected LSDV sequences and other Iranian strains of the LSDV isolates (Table 1). Phylogenetically, four distinct clusters were indicated in the constructed tree of the P32 gene. In the present study, the identified strains of the LSDVs belonged to the second cluster, which contains other isolates of the virus from India (Figure 1).
Table 1.The similarity matrix calculated using Mega 7 for the LSDVs and other Iranian selected LSDVs based on the partial P32 gene sequences.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
||
1 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_strain_UT-Samira-Hamid1 |
#### |
||||||||||
2 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_strain_UT-Samira-Hamid_2 |
98.77 |
||||||||||
3 |
Sheeppox_virus_isolate_SPPV-GL(KT438551.1) |
98.63 |
98.63 |
|||||||||
4 |
Sheeppox_virus_strain_SPPV/SA5/2016(MG232386.1) |
98.63 |
98.63 |
100.00 |
||||||||
5 |
Sheeppox_virus_strain_204/14(MH924596.1) |
98.63 |
98.63 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||||||
6 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_isolate_LSDV-WA-1(KX960778) |
45.06 |
45.96 |
48.28 |
48.28 |
48.28 |
||||||
7 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_isolate_GPV-Vaccine-Gorgan(KX960782) |
45.06 |
45.96 |
48.28 |
48.28 |
48.28 |
99.41 |
|||||
8 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_isolate_ShPV-Vaccine-RM65(KX960781) |
43.83 |
44.72 |
46.90 |
46.90 |
46.90 |
97.65 |
97.06 |
||||
9 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_isolate_LSDV-EA-4(KX960772) |
43.83 |
44.72 |
46.90 |
46.90 |
46.90 |
98.24 |
97.65 |
95.88 |
|||
10 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_strain_Kubash/KAZ/16(MN642592.1) |
43.48 |
42.98 |
43.93 |
43.93 |
43.93 |
46.34 |
47.15 |
46.34 |
46.34 |
||
11 |
Lumpy_skin_disease_virus_isolate_Kenya(MN072619.1) |
43.48 |
42.98 |
43.93 |
43.93 |
43.93 |
46.34 |
47.15 |
46.34 |
46.34 |
100.00 |
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree showing the relationships between the LSDVs (squres) and other selected LSD viruses based on the partial P32 gene.
|
The LSDV is a contagious viral disease that infects cattle. In this study, two herds of cattle were sampled to assess the LSDV. Dead cattle were also studied for the presence of LSDVs by PCR. Among the studied animals, two LSDV cases were identified based on the P32 gene, were examined for phylogeny, and the phylo-genetic tree was drawn.
The phylogenetic tree shows four groups as follow: Group 1 is related to the Iranian isolates that were reported in the past years (circles), Group 2 belongs to the LSDVs detected in the current study (squares), and Groups 3 and 4 refer to other isolates from other countries, especially in the west of Iran (Figure 1). Nucleotide sequence analysis of these isolates showed 99.98% similarity with LSDV strains from different regions of India. However, phylogenetic trees of LSDVs from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Serbia, and Kenya had separate clusters from LSDVs in this study (Table 1).
The LSDVs found in the present study had fewer similarities to other Iranian isolates in other investigations. It could be concluded that probably the source of Iranian isolates is India, and the LSDVs entered Iran from India. Illegal transport of livestock from widespread country borders without proper monitoring and control could be the reason for this subject. The isolates of Iran were less similar to the countries in the west and southwest of Iran, such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia. This indicates that the viruses entered Iran from the east of the country.
The authors would like to thank Ghalyanchi Laboratory experts for their technical support.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.