بررسی آلودگی تک یاخته های میکروسپوریدیا، بلاستوسیستیس، ژیاردیا و کریپتوسپوریدیوم در پرندگان خانگی ارجاع شده به درمانگاه های دامپزشکی شهر تهران به روش انگل شناسی و مولکولی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه انگل شناسی، دانشکده دامپزشکی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 مرکز تحقیقات بیماری‌های منتقله از غذا و آب، پژوهشکده بیماری‌های گوارش و کبد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 گروه بهداشت و تغذیه دام و طیور، دانشکده دامپزشکی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

4 آزمایشگاه مرکزی دامپزشکی، تهران، ایران.

10.32598/ijvm.18.4.1005439

چکیده

زمینه مطالعه: میکروارگانیسم های فرصت طلب دستگاه گوارش از جمله Cryptosporidium spp.، Giardia spp.، Blastocystis sp.، و microsporidia به طور چشمگیری مسئول اختلالات بالینی در گونه های مختلف میزبان از جمله انسان هستند. هدف: در مطالعه حاضر حضور ارگانیسم های فوق در میزبان پرندگان خانگی بررسی شد. ، روش کار: نمونه های دفع شده از 150 پرنده خانگی از کلینیک های دامپزشکی شهر تهران جمع آوری و به صورت میکروسکوپی و مولکولی بررسی شد. ، نتایج: سه مورد از مدفوع های مورد بررسی حاوی ژنوتیپ 1B )2%( انسفالیتوزوون هلم با روش PCR و تعیین توالی بود. ارگانیسم های میکروسپوریدیایی از مدفوع یک طوطی گرین چیک، یک طوطی خاکستری آفریقایی و یک طوطی برزیلی جدا شدند. سایر انگل ها در نمونه های بررسی شده یافت نشد. نتیجه گیری نهایی: مطالعه حاضر ثابت کرد که پرندگان خانگی نگهداری شده در قفس منبع احتمالی عفونت میکروسپوریدیای هستند. ماهیت بسیار مقاوم اسپورهای میکروسپوریدیا، علاوه بر این واقعیت که انسفالیتوزونوزیس عمدتاً در پرندگان تحت بالینی است، می‌تواند صاحبان آن‌ها را در معرض افزایش خطر ابتلا به بیماری از طریق استنشاق یا بلعیدن اسپور قرار دهد. اگرچه منبع و ماهیت عفونت ناشناخته باقی مانده است، ممکن است مطالعات بیشتری برای روشن کردن نقش پرندگان خانگی در اپیدمیولوژی پاتوژن های فرصت طلب مشترک بین انسان و دام توصیه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Introduction
Microsporidia, Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium and Giardia are eukaryotic zoonotic pathogens thriving in the intestinal tract of human, mammalian, and avian hosts. These opportunistic parasites are among the most common causes of gastrointestinal disorders in humans, domestic and wild mammals, and birds. Microsporidia are obligate, intracellular organisms infecting a broad host range, including insects, fish, mammals and birds (Laksemi et al., 2020; Kašičková et al., 2009; Feng & Xiao, 2010). 
More than 1500 species of microsporidia from 200 different genera have been identified, among which Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon species, including Enterocytozoon cuniculi, Enterocytozoon intestinalis and Enterocytozoon hellem are responsible for intestinal infections with the ability to cross the host species barrier (Li et al., 2020; Sak et al., 2010; Keeling & Fast, 2002; Li et al., 2019). E. hellem is the dominant species of microsporidia in birds and the third most reported species in human microsporidiosis. Based on genomic markers, there are seven E. hellem genotypes, which 1A, 1B, 1C and 2B were identified as zoonotic (Robertson et al., 2019). 
Blastocystis sp. is a frequent intestinal protist that includes various genetic subtypes. Several studies have shown that people with close contact with animals are at higher risk for Blastocystis sp. infection. While ST1-ST9 and ST12 were isolated from human samples, ST6 and ST7 are considered “avian STs” because of their relative predominance in birds (Dogruman-Al et al., 2009; Alfellani et al., 2013; Cian et al., 2017). 
Cryptosporidiosis is a protozoan infection in humans, domestic and wild mammals, birds and lower vertebrates (Quah et al., 2011; Ryan et al., 2016). Along with the bird-specific species, Cryptosporidium hominis, Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium muris are the zoonotic species reported by birds that cause respiratory and digestive illnesses. Cryptosporidium meleagridis is the third agent of human cryptosporidiosis, a turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) specific species (Malik et al., 2022; Ibrahim et al., 2007).
There are bird-specific Giardia species, besides reports of Giardia duodenalis assemblages A and B infecting both humans and different species of birds (Ichikawa et al., 2019). Zoonotic giardiasis can be acquired through direct contact with infected asymptomatic carrier hosts, including humans, domestic and wild animals, and birds, and ingestion of infected water sources (Malik et al., 2022; Erlandsen & Bemrick, 1987). 
Zoonotic diseases of public health importance are studied considerably though wild, domestic, caged and ornamental; companion avian hosts have recently contemplated their roles in transmitting and spreading important zoonotic pathogens (Malik et al., 2022). Some of the isolates were shown to be possibly transmitted from these animals to their in-contact workers. 
Considering the close contact of humans and companion avian birds, and given that zoonotic species and genotypes of the parasites mentioned above have been reported in humans and birds, avian hosts may be a risk factor for human infection. Because of the limited number of studies on the population of companion birds worldwide and the country, this study was designed to investigate the occurrence and evaluate the zoonotic potential of these common parasitic protozoa in pet avian species referred to clinics in Tehran City, Iran. 


Materials and Methods


Sample collection
From April to July 2020, fresh droppings were collected from cages of pet birds referred to veterinary clinics in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, located at 35.5501° N, 51.5150° E coordinates. The samples were collected on-site upon admission to the clinic. A total of 150 fecal samples were collected in suitable sealed, labeled, and clean containers and transported to the parasitology laboratory in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tehran University, in Tehran, Iran, without preservative solutions. Before preservation in freeze condition, fecal smears were prepared and stained with the modified Ziehl-Neelsen method for Cryptosporidium, Weber’s chromotrope-based modified trichrome for microsporidia and trichrome for Giardia detection as described by Garcia (2006). The smears were evaluated microscopically. In addition, a portion of the samples was transferred to sterile 1.5 mL tubes and stored at -20 °C for DNA extraction and further analyses. In this study, a total of 150 dropping samples derived from 17 bird species belonging to four bird orders from eight avian families were investigated for the presence of intestinal opportunistic pathogens, including microsporidia, Giardia spp. Blastocystis sp. and Cryptosporidium spp. The studied host species are summarized in Table 1.


DNA extraction and purification
To extract total DNA from samples, 250 mg of stool samples was suspended in 1 mL sterile PBS (pH=7-8). Fecal samples were homogenized by 0.5 mm glass bead disruption. Samples were centrifuged at 2500×g for 3 min, the supernatant was discarded, and DNA was extracted from the remaining pellet using a stool DNA Extraction kit (MBST, Tehran, Iran). The purified DNA samples were stored at -20 °C until assessment via PCR technique. 


PCR amplification
Four specific primers pairs targeting ribosomal genes of Cryptosporidium spp. Blastocystis sp. microsporidia (E. bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp.) and Giardia were selected (Quiles et al., 2019; Scicluna et al., 2006; Hopkins et al., 1997; Jalas & Tavalla, 2018) (Table 2). PCR amplification was performed in a volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL of ready to use master mix, 200 nM of each primer (1 μL each primer), 2 μL of the target DNA sample and 8.5 μL double distilled H2O. Reactions were performed by Eppendorf thermocycler (Master cycler personal). Samples were denatured at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 (PCR) cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94 °C, annealing for 30 s at the appropriate respective annealing temperature, and extension for 30 s at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. For each organism, positively identified samples (kindly provided by Mirjalali) were used in parallel with the clinical sample during the extraction. PCR reaction and electrophoresis were used as positive controls. Amplified fragments were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, USA). 

 

Sequencing and genotyping
Samples yielding an amplified product of the expected size were considered positive even if not sequenced successfully. The positive samples were sequenced (Niagen Noor Company, Iran) in both directions using the amplifying PCR primers. DNA sequences were assembled using BioEdit software, version 7.2.5 (Schneider & Stephens, 1990) and aligned with homologous sequences published in the GenBank database using MEGAX software (Kumar et al., 2018). The obtained sequences were compared and blasted with the sequences available in the GenBank collection (Zhang et al., 2000). A phylogenetic tree was drawn using the MEGAX software, version 10.1.8 and the Neighbor-Joining method (Kumar et al., 2018). Bootstrapping with 1000 replicates was used to determine support for the generated clades. In the case of identified organisms, an appropriate method was applied to characterize the genotype/subtype of the parasite to elucidate its zoonotic potential.


Determination of microsporidia genotype by nested PCR
Because of the length polymorphism among E. hellem genotypes in the polar tube protein (PTP) gene, two sets of primers were used to detect and differentiate E. hellem by nested PCR analysis (Table 3). This primer set generates PCR products of known sizes for genotypes 1A, 1B, 1C and 2B (Xiao et al., 2001).

 

Results


Microscopic and molecular investigation
Microscopic observation of the fecal smears by modified Ziehl-Neelsen and trichrome staining for detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts, Giardia or microsporidia revealed no parasites in the samples. 
Among the total examined fecal samples, Blastocystis sp. Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were not detected in the samples microscopically or molecularly. A green-cheeked parakeet (Pyrrhura molinae), an African gray parrot (AGP) (Psittacus erithacus) (Family: Psittacidae) and a lovebird (Agapornis fischeri) (Family: Psittaculidae) harbored microsporidia in the PCR method. The overall infection frequency of microsporidia was 2% (3/150) and the frequency among the Psittaciformes was 3.119(2.5%). 
The expected ~300 bp PCR products were successfully sequenced for three positive samples. The resultant microsporidia sequences were submitted to the NCBI database under the accession numbers OM777676, OM777677 and OM777678. Pairwise alignment of the sequences from the present study revealed 99.59% identity between the green cheek and the lovebird isolate and 98.76% identity between the gray parrot and the green cheek and or the lovebird isolates (Figure 1).


Phylogenetic tree and genotyping
The isolates in the present study formed a well-supported clade with Encephalitozoon hellem sequences from different avian species and mammalian isolates. (Figure 2).

 

The three isolates were further genotyped based on the sequences of PTP. The examined isolates were genotyped as 1B by yielding a 521 bp band after PTP PCR (Figure 3). 

 

Discussion
Pets, including birds, may act as reservoir hosts for the transmission and or propagation of pathogens between animals and humans. In the present study, pet avian species were investigated for the occurrence of some of the most important zoonotic pathogens, including Cryptosporidium spp. Giardia, Blastocystis sp. and microsporidia utilizing PCR and special staining methods. Among 150 studied droppings from 8 families of pet birds, 3 samples were found to contain E. hellem (2%) by PCR. 
Microsporidia are known as opportunistic pathogens infecting a wide range of vertebrate hosts. The pathogen is spreading via food, water and air contamination with human and animal excretions (Ruan et al., 2021). Among humans’ important zoonotic microsporidian species, E. hellem is the dominant species in wild and captive birds (Jalas & Tavalla, 2018; Itoh et al., 2021). In the present study, E. hellem infection was determined in 3 bird species belonging to Psittaciformes. There are reports of the infection from other bird species, including other parrots (Hopkins et al., 1997; Itoh et al., 2021). as well as hummingbirds, Gouldian finches and ostriches. The prevalence of infection among companion birds in different studies ranged from 1.1% to 15.7% (Pulparampil et al., 1998; Snowden et al., 2000; Snowden & Logan, 1999; Suter et al., 1998) and it was 2% herein. According to SSU genotyping, genotypes 1A, 1C and 2B and according to PTP genotyping, genotypes 1A, 1B, 1C and 2B of E. hellem have zoonotic potential (Robertson et al., 2019). E. hellem has been identified in various bird families and Passeriformes, Apodiformes and many Psittaciformes species were reported to be infected with genotype 1 (further divided into 1A,1B and 1C). All isolates were genotyped as potentially zoonotic genotype 1B in the present study. E. hellem genotypes 1A, 2B and 2C had been isolated from various wild and captive avian hosts. African gray parrots, green-cheek parakeets and lovebirds were reported to harbor genotypes 1A and 2 B (Kašičková et al., 2009; Barati et al., 2022; Pirestani et al., 2013; Rosell et al., 2016; Malcekova et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2011). The hosts in the present study were infected with genotype 1B. According to the authors’ knowledge, it has been reported from Agapornis roseicollis (Snowden et al., 2000) and human cases (Xiao et al., 2001). Studies on bird microsporidiosis in Iran include feral and captive avian species. Pigeons, crows, budgies, and canaries were reported to be infected with E. hellem. The prevalence was from 1.1% in pet shops and captive samples to 4.1% in fecal samples collected from public parks. The genotypes were identified in one of these studies, which were reported as E. hellem genotypes 1A and three based on ITS sequence analysis (Pirestani et al., 2013; Tavalla et al., 2018; Yazdanjooie et al., 2018). Although it has been speculated that birds may act as a mechanical vector for microsporidia, passing and disseminating it through their digestive tract, recently, it has been proven that E. hellem is proliferating in various tissues of the infected companion birds (Kicia et al., 2022). Since E. hellem infection in birds is not always associated with clinical disorder (Lee et al., 2011; Hinney et al., 2016; Mathis et al., 2005), pet shop staff and bird owners may be unaware that their environment is contaminated with feces and aerosols from infected pet birds. 
There are reports of bird infection with different species of Cryptosporidium with a worldwide prevalence of 0.8%-44.4% (Quah et al., 2011; Gharagozlou et al., 2014; Nakamura & Meireles, 2015; Zaheer et al., 2021; Al-Abedi et al., 2022), aside from C. meleagridis, which is prevalent in birds and a proven cause of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis in humans, other zoonotic species are rarely reported from birds (Ibrahim et al., 2007; Goodwin & Krabill, 1989; Meamar et al., 2007). In the present study, Cryptosporidium was not detected either microscopically or molecularly. The mammalian Cryptosporidium species identified from pet birds seem rare and mechanically spreading to humans (Hopkins et al., 1997; Li et al., 2019). Giardiasis in avian hosts has been reported to have varying prevalence in different bird populations (Ichikawa et al., 2019). Despite the reports of G. psittaci and different G. duodenalis assemblages from pet birds, Giardia was not detected in any of the samples in the present study. Despite the low number of Giardia cysts in fecal samples, the subclinical nature of infection in birds makes avian species a source of human infections via direct or indirect contact (Ichikawa et al., 2019; Hopkins et al., 1997; Heyworth, 2016; Saleh Mohammed Al-Samarrai et al., 2022). Blastocystis sp. was not identified in the examined samples in the current study. There are reports of zoonotic Blastocystis sp. subtypes in pet avian species (Barati et al., 2022; Asghari et al., 2019; Maloney et al., 2020; Mohammad Rahimi et al., 2021; Hublin et al., 2021). There should be more epidemiological investigations to explore the factors associated with Blastocystis sp. and public health importance (Wang et al., 2018). 
To elaborate on the role of pet animals in disseminating zoonotic pathogens, molecular and genotype data must be interpreted in association with the supporting epidemiologic and clinical information (Robertson et al., 2019). This search comprehensively includes pathogens such as E. hellem with its broad avian and mammalian hosts, which complicates the significance of avian pets as a source of human infection. Due to the small size of the spore and the intermittent spore excretion, conventional microscopy is usually insufficient for parasite detection in routine stool examination. Thus, further diagnostic methods such as special stains by light or fluorescence microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, serological tests, flow cytometry, histological analysis, cell culture, molecular-based tests, and extensive samplings may strengthen the results of the epidemiological studies.


Conclusion
The current study proved that captive pet birds are a source of microsporidian infection. Besides the fact that Encephalitozoonosis is predominantly subclinical in birds, the highly resistant nature of the microsporidia spores can put the owners, especially children and elderly with impaired immune systems, at increased risk of disease acquisition via spore inhalation or ingestion. Further, studies designed with a broader sampling population using repeated sampling to overcome the intermittent spore shedding and multi-loci molecular diagnostics are recommended to truly evaluate the role of pet birds in the epidemiology of zoonotic opportunistic pathogens.


Ethical Considerations


Compliance with ethical guidelines
All procedures were conducted according to the Animal Care Guidelines of the Research Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tehran University (Code: (28864/6/6).


Funding
All authors equally contributed to preparing this article.


Authors' contributions
All authors equally contributed to preparing this article.


Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest. 


Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank their colleagues at the faculty of veterinary medicine who helped during the project. 

 

 

 


References

Al-Abedi, G. J. K., Al-Eodawee, E. M. M., Khalili, S., & Gharban, H. A. J. (2022). First molecular genotyping of cryptosporidium felis in cattle, Iraq. Archives of Razi Institute, 77(6), 2345–2352. [DOI:10.22092/ARI.2022.358621.2271] [PMID]

Alfellani, M. A., Taner-Mulla, D., Jacob, A. S., Imeede, C. , Yoshikawa, H., & Stensvold, C. R., et al. (2013). Genetic diversity of blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals. Protist, 164(4), 497–509. [DOI:10.1016/j.protis.2013.05.003][PMID]

Asghari, A., Sadraei, J., Pirestani, M., & Mohammadpour, I. (2019). First molecular identification and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. isolated from hooded crows (Corvus cornix) and pigeons (Columba livia) in Tehran Province, Iran. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 62, 25–30. [DOI:10.1016/j.cimid.2018.11.013][PMID]

Barati, M., KarimiPourSaryazdi, A., Rahmanian, V., Bahadory, S., Abdoli, A., & Rezanezhad, H., et al. (2022). Global prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in rodents, birds, and water supplies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 208, 105770. [DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105770][PMID]

Cian, A., El Safadi, D., Osman, M., Moriniere, R., Gantois, N., & Benamrouz-Vanneste, S., et al. (2017). Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. in various animal groups from two french zoos and evaluation of potential zoonotic risk. Plos One, 12(1), e0169659. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169659][PMID][PMCID]

Dogruman-Al, F., Kustimur, S., Yoshikawa, H., Tuncer, C., Simsek, Z., & Tanyuksel, M., et al. (2009). Blastocystis subtypes in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease in Ankara, Turkey. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 104(5), 724–727. [DOI:10.1590/S0074-02762009000500011][PMID]

Erlandsen, S. L., & Bemrick, W. J. (1987). SEM evidence for a new species, Giardia psittaci. The Journal of Parasitology, 73(3), 623–629. [PMID]

Feng, Y., & Xiao, L. (2011). Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 24(1), 110–140. [DOI:10.1128/CMR.00033-10][PMID][PMCID]

Garcia, L. S. (2006). Diagnostic medical parasitology. Washington:ASM Press. [Link]

Gharagozlou, M. J., Nouri, M., & Pourhajati, V. (2014). Cryptosporidial Infection of lower respiratory tract in a budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulates). Archives of Razi Institute, 69(1), 95-97. [DOI:10.7508/ari.2014.01.014]

Goodwin, M. A., & Krabill, V. A. (1989). Diarrhea associated with small-intestinal cryptosporidiosis in a budgerigar and in a cockatiel. Avian Diseases, 33(4), 829–833. [DOI:10.2307/1591170][PMID]

Hopkins, R. M., Meloni, B. P., Groth, D. M., Wetherall, J. D., Reynoldson, J. A., & Thompson, R. C. (1997). Ribosomal RNA sequencing reveals differences between the genotypes of Giardia isolates recovered from humans and dogs living in the same locality. The Journal of Parasitology, 83(1), 44–51. [PMID]

Heyworth M. F. (2016). Giardia duodenalis genetic assemblages and hosts. Parasite, 23, 13. [DOI:10.1051/parasite/2016013][PMID][PMCID]

Hinney, B., Sak, B., Joachim, A., & Kváč, M. (2016). More than a rabbit's tale-Encephalitozoon spp. in wild mammals and birds. International Journal for Parasitology, 5(1), 76–87. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.01.001][PMID][PMCID]

Hublin, J. S. Y., Maloney, J. G., & Santin, M. (2021). Blastocystis in domesticated and wild mammals and birds. Research in Veterinary Science, 135, 260–282. [DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.031][PMID]

Ibrahim, U. I., Mbaya, A. W., Mahmud, H., & Mohammed, A. (2007). Prevalence of cryptosporidiosis among captive wild animals and birds in the arid region of north-eastern Nigeria. Veterinarski Arhiv, 77(4), 337-344. [Link]

Ichikawa, R. S., Santana, B. N., Ferrari, E. D., do Nascimento, I. G., Nakamura, A. A., & Nardi, A. R. M., et al. (2019). Detection and molecular characterization of Giardia spp. in captive Psittaciformes in Brazil. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 164, 10– [DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.01.006][PMID]

Itoh, N., Kameshima, S., & Kimura, Y. (2021). Molecular identification of encephalitozoon hellem from companion birds kept in pet shops, Japan. Medical Mycology Journal, 62(3), 59–62. [DOI:10.3314/mmj.21-00007][PMID]

Jalas, M., & Tavalla, M. (2018). Molecular diagnosis and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in exotic birds of southwest of Iran. Tropical Biomedicine, 35(4), 944–950. [PMID]

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1547–1549. [DOI:10.1093/molbev/msw054][PMID][PMCID]

Kicia, M., Zajączkowska, Ż., Kváč, M., Cebulski, K., Holubová, N., & Wencel, P., et al. (2022). Encephalitozoon cuniculi and extraintestinal microsporidiosis in bird owners. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 28(3), 705–708. [DOI:10.3201/eid2803.211556][PMID][PMCID]

Keeling, P. J., & Fast, N. M. (2002). Microsporidia: Biology and evolution of highly reduced intracellular parasites. Annual Review of Microbiology, 56, 93–116. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160854][PMID]

Kasicková, D., Sak, B., Kvác, M., & Ditrich, O. (2009). Sources of potentially infectious human microsporidia: Molecular characterisation of microsporidia isolates from exotic birds in the Czech Republic, prevalence study and importance of birds in epidemiology of the human microsporidial infections. Veterinary Parasitology, 165(1-2), 125–130. [DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.06.033][PMID]

Laksemi, D. A., Suwanti, L. T., Mufasirin, M., Suastika, K., & Sudarmaja, M. (2019). Opportunistic parasitic infections in patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: A review. Veterinary World, 13(4), 716–725. [DOI:10.14202%2Fvetworld.2020.716-725][PMID][PMCID]

Li, W., Feng, Y., & Xiao, L. (2020). Diagnosis and molecular typing of Enterocytozoon bieneusi: The significant role of domestic animals in transmission of human microsporidiosis. Research in Veterinary Science, 133, 251–261. [DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.030][PMID]

Li, W., Feng, Y., & Santin, M. (2019). Host specificity of enterocytozoon bieneusi and public health implications. Trends in Parasitology, 35(6), 436–451. [DOI:10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004][PMID]

Li, Q., Li, L., Tao, W., Jiang, Y., Wan, Q., & Lin, Y., et al. (2016). Molecular investigation of cryptosporidium in small caged pets in northeast China: Host specificity and zoonotic implications. Parasitology Research, 115(7), 2905–2911. [DOI:10.1007/s00436-016-5076-4][PMID]

Lee, S. Y., Lee, S. S., Lyoo, Y. S., & Park, H. M. (2011). DNA detection and genotypic identification of potentially human-pathogenic microsporidia from asymptomatic pet parrots in South Korea as a risk factor for zoonotic emergence. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(23), 8442–8444. [DOI:10.1128/AEM.05343-11][PMID][PMCID]

Meamar, A. R., Guyot, K., Certad, G., Dei-Cas, E., Mohraz, M., & Mohebali, M., et al. (2007). Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans and animals in Iran. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(3), 1033–1035. [DOI:10.1128/AEM.00964-06][PMID][PMCID]

Maloney, J. G., Molokin, A., da Cunha, M. J. R., Cury, M. C., & Santin, M. (2020). Blastocystis subtype distribution in domestic and captive wild bird species from Brazil using next generation amplicon sequencing. Parasite Epidemiology and Control, 9, e00138. [DOI:10.1016/j.parepi.2020.e00138][PMID][PMCID]

Mohammad Rahimi, H., Mirjalali, H., & Zali, M. R. (2021). Molecular epidemiology and genotype/subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Encephalitozoon spp. in livestock: Concern for emerging zoonotic infections. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 17467. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-96960-x][PMID][PMCID]

Malčeková, B., Valenčáková, A., Luptáková, L., Ravaszová, P., & Halánová, M. (2010). Genotyping of medically important species of Microsporidia and their geographic distribution. Folia Veterinaria, 54(3), 154-166. [Link]

Malik, Y. S., Milton, A. A. P., Ghatak, S., & Ghosh, S. (2022). Role of birds in transmitting zoonotic pathogens. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-16-4554-9]

Mathis, A., Weber, R., & Deplazes, P. (2005). Zoonotic potential of the microsporidia. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 18(3), 423–445. [DOI:10.1128/CMR.18.3.423-445.2005][PMID][PMCID]

Nakamura, A. A., & Meireles, M. V. (2015). Cryptosporidium infections in birds-A review. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 24(3), 253–267. [DOI:10.1590/S1984-29612015063][PMID]

Pirestani, M., Sadraei, J., Forouzandeh, M. J. (2013). Molecular characterization and genotyping of human related Microsporidia in free-ranging and captive pigeons of Tehran, Iran, Infect. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 20, 495-499. [DOI:10.1016/j.meegid.2013.10.007]

Pulparampil, N., Graham, D., Phalen, D., & Snowden, K. (1998). Encephalitozoon hellem in two eclectus parrots (Eclectus roratus): Identification from archival tissues. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 45(6), 651–655. [DOI:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1998.tb04562.x][PMID]

Quah, J. X., Ambu, S., Lim, Y. A., Mahdy, M. A., & Mak, J. W. (2011). Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium parvum from avian hosts. Parasitology, 138(5), 573–577. [DOI:10.1017/S0031182010001691][PMID]

Quiles, A., Bacela-Spychalska, K., Teixeira, M., Lambin, N., Grabowski, M., & Rigaud, T., et al. (2019). Microsporidian infections in the species complex Gammarus roeselii (Amphipoda) over its geographical range: Evidence for both host-parasite co-diversification and recent host shifts. Parasites & Vectors, 12(1), 327. [DOI:10.1186/s13071-019-3571-z][PMID][PMCID]

Ryan, U., Zahedi, A., & Paparini, A. (2016). Cryptosporidium in humans and animals-a one health approach to prophylaxis. Parasite Immunology, 38(9), 535–547. [DOI:10.1111/pim.12350][PMID]

Ruan, Y., Xu, X., He, Q., Li, L., Guo, J., & Bao, J., et al. (2021). The largest meta-analysis on the global prevalence of microsporidia in mammals, avian and water provides insights into the epidemic features of these ubiquitous pathogens. Parasites & Vectors, 14(1), 186. [DOI:10.1186/s13071-021-04700-x][PMID][PMCID]

Rosell, J., Máinez, M., Didier, E. S., Bowers, L. C., Marco, A., & Juan-Sallés, C. (2016). Encephalitozoon hellem infection in aviary passerine and psittacine birds in Spain. Veterinary Parasitology, 219, 57–60. [DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.01.022][PMID][PMCID]

Robertson, L. J., Clark, C. G., Debenham, J. J., Dubey, J. P., Kváč, M., Li, J., & Ponce-Gordo, F., et al. (2019). Are molecular tools clarifying or confusing our understanding of the public health threat from zoonotic enteric protozoa in wildlife? International Journal for Parasitology, 9, 323–341. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijppaw.01.010][PMID][PMCID]

Scicluna, S. M., Tawari, B., & Clark, C. G. (2006). DNA barcoding of blastocystis. Protist, 157(1), 77–85. [DOI:10.1016/j.protis.2005.12.001][PMID]

Sak, B., Kasicková, D., Kvác, M., Kvetonová, D., & Ditrich, O. (2010). Microsporidia in exotic birds: intermittent spore excretion of Encephalitozoon spp. in naturally infected budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Veterinary Parasitology, 168(3-4), 196–200. [DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.012][PMID]

Saleh Mohammed Al-Samarrai, A., Razooq Hameed Al-Samarrai, R., & Ibrahim Hamdi, B. (2022). An investigation of parasitic protozoa in drinking water in Samarra, Iraq. Archives of Razi Institute, 77(2), 821-825. [DOI:10.22092/ari.2022.357106.1977]

Schneider, T. D., & Stephens, R. M. (1990). Sequence logos: A new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 18(20), 6097–6100. [DOI:10.1093/nar/18.20.6097][PMID][PMCID]

Snowden, K. F., Logan, K., & Phalen, D. N. (2000). Isolation and characterization of an avian isolate of Encephalitozoon hellem. Parasitology, 121(Pt 1), 9–14. [DOI:10.1017/S0031182099005995][PMID]

Snowden, K., & Logan, K. (1999). Molecular identification of encephalitozoon hellem in an ostrich. Avian Diseases, 43(4), 779–782. [PMID]

Suter, C., Mathis, A., Hoop, R., & Deplazes, P. (1998). Encephalitozoon hellem infection in a yellow-streaked lory (Chalcopsitta scintillata) imported from Indonesia. The Veterinary Record, 143(25), 694–695. [PMID]

Taghipour, A., Ghodsian, S., Jabbari, M., Rajabpour, V., Bahadory, S., & Malih, N., et al. (2024). The global epidemiology of Microsporidia infection in birds: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 34(5), 2180–2196. [DOI:11080/09603123.2023.2219988][PMID]

Tavalla, M., Mardani-Kateki, M., Abdizadeh, R., Soltani, S., & Saki, J. (2018). Molecular diagnosis of potentially human pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon species in exotic birds in Southwestern Ir Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11(2), 192–196. [DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2017.07.028][PMID]

Wang, J., Gong, B., Liu, X., Zhao, W., Bu, T., Zhang, W., Liu, A., & Yang, F. (2018). Distribution and genetic diversity of Blastocystis subtypes in various mammal and bird species in northeastern China. Parasites & Vectors, 11(1), 522. [DOI:10.1186/s13071-018-3106-z][PMID][PMCID]

Xiao, L., Li, L., Moura, H., Sulaiman, I., Lal, A. A., & Gatti, S., et al. (2001). Genotyping encephalitozoon hellem isolates by analysis of the polar tube protein gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(6), 2191–2196. [DOI:10.1128%2FJCM.39.6.2191-2196.2001][PMID][PMCID]

Yazdanjooie, M., Sadraei, J., Dalimi, A., & Pirestani, M. (2018). Isolation of Encephalitozoon intestinalis from crows living in urban parks of Tehran, Iran: An investigation with zoonotic aspect. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 42(4), 494–499. [DOI:10.1007/s12639-018-1024-9][PMID][PMCID]

Zaheer, T., Imran, M., Abbas, R. Z., Zaheer, I., Malik, M. A. (2021). Avian cryptosporidiosis and its zoonotic significance in Asia. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 77(1), 55-70. [DOI:10.1080/00439339.2020.1866961]

Zhang, Z., Schwartz, S., Wagner, L., & Miller, W. (2000). A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology, 7(1-2), 203–214. [DOI:10.1089/10665270050081478] [PMID]