ردیابی و تعیین ویژگی‌های مولکولی روتاویروس‌های پرندگان در مزارع گوشتی در گیلان

نوع مقاله : عوامل عفونی - بیماریها

نویسندگان

1 گروه بهداشت و بیماری‌های طیور، دانشکده دامپزشکی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 1گروه بیماریهای طیور، دانشکده دامپزشکی دانشگاه تهران ، تهران، ایران

3 گروه میکروبیولوژی و ایمونولوژی، دانشکده دامپزشکی دانشگاه تهران

4 3گروه علوم درمانگاهی، دانشکده دامپزشکی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

چکیده

زمینه مطالعه: روتاویروس‌های پرندگان از عوامل مهم التهاب روده در پرندگان بوده و دارای گسترش جهانی می‌باشند. این ویروس‌ها نقش مهمی در سندروم کوتولگی و از رشد ماندگی در مرغ‌ها دارند.
هدف: هدف این مطالعه ردیابی و تعیین ویژگی‌های مولکولی روتاویروس‌های پرندگان در مزارع گوشتی استان گیلان می‌باشد.
روش کار: در این مطالعه، 100 نمونه ازروده مرغان گوشتی سالم و بیمار در مزارع مختلف جمع آوری گردیدند و به وسیله روش RT-PCR بر روی ژن NSP4 مورد آزمایش قرار گرفتند. برای تعیین ویژگی‌های ویروس‌های ردیابی شده، از توالی یابی ژن NSP4 استفاده گردید.
نتایج: با استاده از RT-PCR روتاویروس‌های پرندگان در 46% نمونه‌ها ردیابی شدند. توالی یابی نسبی هفت ژن NSP4 و آنالیز فیلوژنتیکی آن‌ها نشان داد که ویروس‌ها متعلق به گروه A روتاویروس‌های پرندگان بوده و درصد شباهت بین آن‌ها 52/97 تا 100% است. تشابه توالی بین ویروس‌های این مطالعه و روتاویروس‌های مرغی قبلی 68/31 تا 5/99 % بود. در مقایسه با روتاویروس بوقلمون (Ty-1)، و روتاویروس کبوتر، شباهت به ترتیب بین 98/76 تا 22/78% و 75/74 تا 98/76% نشان داده شد. تفاوت‌های مشخصی بین روتاویروس‌های این مطالعه و روتاویروس‌های انسان و خوک با تشابه 19/31 تا 86/38% برای ویروس‌های خوک و 77/47 تا 02/48% برای ویروس‌های انسان مشاهده شد.
نتیجه گیری نهایی: این مطالعه، برای اولین بار، ویژگی‌های مولکولی روتاویروسهای پرندگان در ایران را تعیین نمود. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که گروه A روتاویروس‌های پرندگان یکی از پاتوژن‌های روده‌ای مهم در مرغ‌های گوشتی استان گیلان می‌باشند. مطالعه بیشتر بر روی ساختار کل ژنوم می‌تواند فرایند تکاملی روتاویروس‌های پرندگان در حال گردش در ایران را توضیح دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Enteritis has detrimental economic impact on the poultry industry because it decreases feed absorption and retards growth. Rotaviruses are one of the most prevalent causes of viral enteritis and are found in both diseased and healthy birds (Villarreal et al., 2006; Moura-Alvarez et al., 2013; Beserra et al., 2014). Rotavirus infections have a worldwide distribution (Knipe et al., 2013). The first report of avian rotaviruses was from turkey poults suffering from enteritis in the USA in 1977 and in the UK in 1978 (McNulty  et al., 1978). These viruses belong to the family Reoviridae and are non-envelope icosahedral particles that have double-stranded RNA with an 11-segmented genome. These segments encode 12 structural and non-structural proteins (VP1, VP2, VP3, VP4, VP6, VP7, NSP1, NSP2, NSP3, NSP4, NSP5, and NSP6).

Group and subgroup-specific antigens are located on the VP6 protein, while those of serotypes are located on VP4 and VP7. The rotaviruses have been classified into eight groups (A-H) based on the VP6 protein (Estes et al., 1989). Groups D, F, and G are bird specific (Trojnar et al., 2010) and group A is common to birds and mammals. NSP4 is a nonstructural protein that acts as an intracellular receptor for immature viral particles and interacts with capsid proteins during morphogenesis of the virus. NSP4 is also an enterotoxin that is capable of causing diarrhea (Kirkwood et al., 1997). Mutation in the NSP4 gene can cause variations in the virulence of avian rotaviruses (Zhang et al., 1998). Because the NSP4 gene is somewhat well-conserved, it can be used to screen for rotaviruses in poultry samples (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2007; Kirkwood et al., 1997).

Rotavirus transmission occurs directly and indirectly through the fecal-oral route. Natural infection by rotaviruses occurs in chickens, turkeys, pheasants, partridges, ostriches and ducks (Silva et al., 2012).  The disease symptoms usually appear at less than 6 weeks of age (Dhama et al., 1986). Rotavirus infections can be accompanied with other gastrointestinal pathogens (Day et al., 2013; Nunez et al., 2013; Roussan et al., 2012). They are one of the agents involved in runting and stunting syndrome (RSS) in chickens and poult enteritis syndrome (PES) in poults (Nunez et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2012; Otto et al., 2006). RSS is a syndrome with transient diarrhea followed by growth retardation. It has mild clinical symptoms, but causes substantial economic loss and disturbs growth uniformity. Intestinal villous atrophy is frequently detected in chicks examined from flocks with RSS (Otto et al., 2006).

The current study was performed on broiler farms in Guilan province of northern Iran, which is a region of intensive commercial poultry production and because of the significant role of a healthy gastrointestinal tract for optimal weight gain.

Materials and Methods

Sampling: One hundred 1-6 week-old chickens were selected from five broiler farms in five cities in Guilan province (37.2809° N and 49.5924° E). Five farms were randomly selected, each for a specific age range, and 10 healthy and 10 diseased birds were randomly collected from each farm. The sample characteristics are shown in Table 1. The clinical signs of diseased birds were growth retardation, stunting and diarrhea. In some chickens with severe diarrhea, the intestinal walls were distended and gaseous and the contents were frothy. A few birds showed no diarrhea, but had growth retardation.

The birds were euthanized and the intestines were removed and 1 cm each of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were excised. Next, the intestines were mixed with three parts of sterile PBS and homogenized. The homogenized tissue was vortexed for 2 min and then centrifuged at 2000 × g for 15 min and the supernatants were harvested into 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. The microtubes were stored at -20 °C for the next steps.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis: Viral RNA was extracted from 100 μl of the sample supernatants using an RNX solution (SinaClon) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was stored at -70°C. The generation of cDNA was performed using Fermantas cDNA synthesis kit. Two-step RT-PCR was performed to amplify a distinct region (630 bp) of the nonstructural NSP4 gene. The synthesis of cDNA was carried out according to kit protocol in which 1 μL of random hexamer was added to 5 μl of extracted RNA (master mix 1). After that, the prepared master mix was incubated at 65 °C for 15 min and at 5 °C for 1 min. In the next step, 7.25 μl distilled water, 4 μl buffer 5X, 0.25 μl RNase inhibitor, 2 μl dNTP (10 mM) and 0.5 μl of RT enzyme were added to the master mix. The total volume (20 μl) was incubated in a thermocycler according to the following program: 25 °C for 5 min, 42 °C for 60 min, 95 °C for 5 min and 5 °C for 1 min.

PCR for NSP4 gene amplification: Rotaviruses were detected using a set of primers targeting the well-conserved region of the NSP4 gene. The sequence of the primer was: forward (5’-GTG CGG AAA GAT GGA GAAC-3’) and reverse (5’-GTT GGG GTA CCA GGG ATT AA-3’) (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2007). The amplification was performed in a final volume of 20 μl containing 2 μl distilled water, 13 μl of PCR 2X master mix (SinaClon; Iran), 2 μl of primer (10 μM) and 3 μl of cDNA. Amplification was performed with a 35-cycle thermal profile of 94 °C for 2 min, 94 °C for 30 sec, 58 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 30 sec and 72 °C for 10 min. The reaction products were visualized under UV light.

Phylogenetic analysis: The RT-PCR products were sequenced by Bioneer (Korea). Multiple sequence alignments were performed with ClustalW and a phylogenic tree was constructed with MEGA 7 software using the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates to assign confidence levels to the branches. The ARV sequences were aligned and compared with reference strains (Fig.1). The sequences obtained were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database. The amplified part of the NSP4 gene sequence of the ARV was submitted to GenBank with the following accession numbers: MH106448-MH106454.

 

 

 

Table 1: Characteristics of broiler flocks from RT-PCR for avian rotaviruses in Guilan province in 2017

Farm   location

Age

(week)

No   of samples

Geographical   latitude and latitude

Rasht

1W

20

37°16′51″N 49°34′59″E

Langarud

2W

20

37°11′49″N 50°09′13″E

Talesh

3W

20

37.801424°N 48.906695°E

Sowmesara

4W

20

37°18′42″N 49°19′19″E

Shaft

6W

20

37°10′13″N 49°23′59″E

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results

Rotaviruses were identified in 46% of the samples. ARVs were detected in 66% of diseased and 26% of healthy birds. The percentage of positive and negative cases on each farm is shown in Fig. 2. The RT-PCR products of seven positive samples were sequenced and compared with previously published sequences for chicken, pigeon, turkey, pig and human rotaviruses.

All rotaviruses sequenced in this study were placed in a common group (group A) and had a sequence homology of 97.52% to 100% (Table 2). In addition, the homology of the NSP4 gene sequence with other previously reported chicken rotaviruses was 31.68% to 99.5%. Compared to the turkey rotavirus Ty-1 (AB065285) in group A, the homology was 76.98% to 78.22%. The range of similarity of the detected chicken rotaviruses with pigeon rotavirus pigeon-wt/NIE/NIE08_A_568/2008/GXP (KX826054) was 74.75% to 76.98%. There were obvious differences among the nucleotide sequences of the rotaviruses detected in the current study and pig and human viruses. The homology was 31.19% to 38.86% for pig and 47.77% to 48.02% for human viruses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Percentage of identity of partial nucleotide sequences of NSP4 of Iranian AvRVs to those of ARV reference strains

   

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1

MH106448

                                     

2

MH106454

99.50

                                   

3

MH106449

100

99.50

                                 

4

MH106450

100

99.50

100

                               

5

MH106453

100

99.50

100

100

                             

6

MH106452

98.27

97.77

98.27

98.27

98.27

                           

7

MH106451

98.02

97.52

98.02

98.02

98.02

99.75

                         

8

Rota1063-5

97.77

97.28

97.77

97.77

97.77

99.50

99.26

                       

9

Rota1063-7

97.77

97.28

97.77

97.77

97.77

99.50

99.26

100.00

                     

10

AB065285

78.22

78.71

78.22

78.22

78.22

77.23

76.98

76.98

76.98

                   

11

KX826054

76.49

76.98

76.49

76.49

76.49

75.00

74.75

74.75

74.75

91.09

                 

12

JX4747551

81.44

81.44

81.44

81.44

81.44

81.93

82.18

81.44

81.44

74.75

72.52

               

13

K932157

85.15

85.15

85.15

85.15

85.15

84.41

84.65

83.91

83.91

75.00

74.26

85.40

             

14

JX474761

82.92

82.92

82.92

82.92

82.92

82.92

83.17

82.43

82.43

74.01

72.28

95.05

86.63

           

15

KR052712

38.37

38.37

38.37

38.37

38.37

38.61

38.86

38.37

38.37

38.61

37.87

38.12

38.61

38.12

         

16

KF142490

34.41

34.65

34.41

34.41

34.41

33.91

33.66

33.42

33.42

35.64

36.39

35.89

33.66

34.41

30.69

       

17

X362567

31.68

31.68

31.68

31.68

31.68

31.44

31.19

31.68

31.68

30.94

31.68

32.43

35.15

31.68

35.64

29.21

     

18

KJ752082

32.67

32.43

32.67

32.67

32.67

31.68

31.93

31.44

31.44

34.41

32.18

35.64

33.42

34.65

48.27

32.92

31.44

   

19

KT148607

48.02

48.02

48.02

48.02

48.02

47.77

48.02

47.77

47.77

47.28

44.31

48.02

47.77

48.76

34.16

32.18

31.44

31.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

Enteric viruses can cause economic loss due to enteritis, decreased feed absorption, reduced weight gain, diarrhea, and death (Guy ,1998). Rotaviruses are important causes of enteritis and have a worldwide distribution. These viruses are agents of RSS in chickens and can be found in healthy and diseased birds (Otto et al., 2012). There has been no detailed study on the prevalence and molecular characteristics of rotaviruses in Iran. Because of the negative effects of rotavirus infections on broiler chickens, the current study was performed to determine the rate of avian rotavirus infection in broiler farms in northern Iran.

In the current study, the intestinal segments of 100 broiler chickens were tested. Because the rotavirus can exist in both healthy and diseased birds, both types were selected for sampling. Rotaviruses were detected in 46% of samples. The rate of infection in diseased birds was higher than in healthy ones. The higher percentage of rotaviruses in diseased birds emphasizes their probable role in the poor performance, growth retardation, enteritis and related symptoms that are attributed to this virus.

All of the sequenced viruses belonged to group A rotaviruses. In a study on detection of rotaviruses in chickens (2006), Villarreal et al. (Villarreal et al., 2006) reported a rotavirus frequency of 48.7% in samples from flocks with diarrhea symptoms, 46.4% in flocks with delayed growth and 30% in healthy flocks using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). In another survey from northern Germany (2006), 32 of 34 chicks with RSS were positive for rotavirus and group A rotaviruses were identified by RT-PCR in samples of 20 chicks with RSS. Using the PAGE method, groups A, D, G, and F were identified. Microscopic observation suggested that group D caused more severe villous atrophy in the intestines and played a major role in the pathogenesis of RSS (Otto et al., 2006).

A study for the detection of rotaviruses in commercial chicken and turkey farms in the United States (2006) indicated the presence of rotavirus in 46.5% of broiler chicken farms (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2008). Group A and D rotaviruses have been detected by the PAGE method from diarrheic poultry in central India in 2006; however, the prevalence of group D was higher (77.8%) than group A (22.22%) (Savita et al., 2008). Bezerra et al. reported the occurrence of group D rotavirus in apparently healthy chickens in Brazil (2012) (Bezerra et al., 2012). In another study from India (2013), Kattoor et al. detected group D rotavirus in 1-2 week old commercial broiler chicks with symptoms of diarrhea (Kattoor et al., 2013). An epidemiological study for molecular detection of groups A and D rotaviruses in healthy and diseased birds in Nigeria (2017) done by Pauly et al. detected groups A and D in 51.9% and 48.1% of healthy and 18.9% and 29.7% in diseased chickens, respectively (Pauly et al., 2017).

Otto et al., detected rotaviruses in 46.2% of samples taken from chickens and turkeys in European and Bangladeshi farms between 2005 and 2008. Groups A, D, F and G were recognized. Groups D and A were the most abundant and F and G were the least. Groups F and G were shown in the PAGE pattern in only 2% of samples. Following the first study, they detected rotaviruses in 85% of samples and group A and D were detected by real time RT-PCR in high percentages again between 2009 and 2010 (Otto et al., 2012). This study emphasizes the high prevalence of groups D and A in diseased birds. In a molecular survey for detection of enteric viruses in commercial broiler and layer chickens with a history of enteritis in Korea done by Koo et al. (2013), 85.3% of investigated farms were positive for enteric viruses, but rotaviruses were detected only in 5.9% of samples in the RT-PCR. The two viruses sequenced in their study belonged to group A rotaviruses (Koo et al., 2013).

Studies have shown that groups A and D are predominant groups among poultry in both diseased and healthy birds. Phylogenetic analysis of the NSP4 gene detected in the current study indicated a sequence homology of 97.52% to 100%. Pantin-Jackwood et al. reported a sequence identity between rotaviruses of chicken origin from the US of 89.2% to 100% (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2008). These findings indicate that chicken rotaviruses of adjacent areas have high sequence homology. In the present study, the homology of the NSP4 gene sequence with other chicken rotaviruses showed a wide range of 31.68% to 99.5%. The lowest homology was for RVG/chicken/ZAF/MRC-DPRU1679/2011 (KJ752082) and RVD/chicken/India/UKD48/2012 (KF142490). These two viruses belonged to groups G and D, which may explain the reason for the low identity with Iranian viruses. Turkey rotavirus Ty-1 and pigeon rotavirus pigeon-wt/NIE/NIE08_A_568/2008/GXP have been placed in a separate clade from chicken AvRVs. This separation could be due to a homology of 76.98% to 78.22% and 74.75% to 76.98% between Iranian chicken viruses and turkey and pigeon viruses, respectively.

The assortment of turkey and pigeon rotaviruses in a separate group from that of chicken-based viruses on the NSP4 gene could be a barrier for interspecies transmission (Jindal et al., 2010)..In a study by Mori et al. (2002) a group A chicken AvRV (Ch-1) NSP4 gene was sequenced and Ch-1 showed only 78.79% amino acid identity with other avian rotaviruses. Also, the identity between strain Ch-2G3 and pigeon PO-13 was 79.3% (Mori et al., 2002). Another study comparing turkey AvRVs and chicken Ch-1 strain (2007) showed 76.3% and 76.9% identity (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2007). Turkey rotaviruses detected by Jindal et al. (2010) of PES showed a sequence homology of 66% to 69% with previously published chicken AvRVs. Phylogenetic analysis of the NSP4 gene sequence placed turkey rotaviruses in a separate clade from chicken rotaviruses (Jindal et al., 2010).

NSP4 gene nucleotide sequences of chicken AvRVs and mammal rotaviruses showed very low identity percentages of 31.19% to 38.86% and 47.77% to 48.02% for pig and human viruses, respectively. Although human RVA (KT148607) falls into group A, its homology with chicken AvRVs is low. This difference may indicate that the human group A rotaviruses have separated from a common ancestor in the evolutionary process (Trojnar et al., 2009; Mori et al., 2002). Mori et al. (2002) showed that amino acid sequences deduced from the NSP4 genes of group A avian rotaviruses have low identities with mammalian strains (31% to 37%) (Mori et al., 2002). The findings of Trojnar et al. (2009) confirm the wide distance between avian and mammalian rotaviruses, for which the identity of chicken AvRV to mammalian RV NSP4 sequences was low (30.8% to33.7%) (Trojnar et al., 2009).

Results of this study showed that the group A avian rotaviruses are one of the considerable enteric viruses in broiler chickens of Guilan province. The high percentage of AvRVs in the diseased birds in this study indicates that this virus has contributed to the symptoms stated previously. Group A mammalian rotaviruses are distant to avian ones in the phylogenetic tree and probably have separated in the evolutionary process. The results of this study agree with those of previous works done. Further study is needed for molecular characterization of additional viruses and sequencing of genes other than NSP4. Molecular study of avian rotaviruses in wild and domestic birds can help to recognize the sources of rotaviruses on industrial farms. Electron microscopy and PAGE could help to characterize virus morphology and dsRNA profile accurately.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with grant from the Research Council of the University of Tehran (No. 7508013/6/24).We are grateful to our colleagues in the head office of Guilan Veterinary for their extensive support.

Conflicts of interest

The author declared no conflict of interest.

Beserra, L. A. R., Gregori, F. (2014). Description of rotavirus F in broilers from Brazilian poultry farms. Avian Dis, 58, 458-461. PMID: 25518442
Bezerra, D. A. M., da Silva, R. R., Kaiano, J. H. L., Silvestre, R. V. D., de Souza Oliveira, D., Linhares, A. C. (2012). Detection of avian group D rotavirus using the polymerase chain reaction for the VP6 gene. J Virol Methods, 185, 189-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.017 PMID: 22820073
Day, J. M., Zsak, L. (2013). Recent progress in the characterization of avian enteric viruses. Avian Dis, 57, 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1637/10390-092712-Review.1 PMID: 24283121
Dhama, K., Saminathan, M., Karthik, K., Tiwari, R., Shabbir, M. Z., Kumar, N. (2015). Avian rotavirus enteritis–an updated review. Vet Q, 35, 142-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2015.1046014 PMID: 25917772
Estes, M. K., Cohen, J. (1989). Rotavirus gene structure and function. Microbiol Rev, 53, 410-449. PMID: 2556635.
Guy, J. S. (1998). Virus infections of the gastrointestinal tract of poultry. Poult Sci, 77, 1166-1175. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.8.1166 PMID: 9706084
Jindal, N., Patnayak, D., Chander, Y., Ziegler, A., Goyal, S. (2010). Detection and molecular characterization of enteric viruses from poult enteritis syndrome in turkeys. Poult Sci, 89, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00424,PMID: 20075272.
Jindal, N., Patnayak, D., Ziegler, A., Lago, A., Goyal, S. (2009). Experimental reproduction of poult enteritis syndrome: clinical findings, growth response, and microbiology. Poult Sci, 88, 949-958. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00490 PMID: 19359682
 Kang, K.I., El-Gazzar, M., Sellers, H.S., Dorea, F., Williams, S.M., Kim, T., et al. (2012). Investigation into the aetiology of runting and stunting syndrome in chickens. Avian Pathol, 41, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2011.632402 PMID: 22845320
Kattoor, J. J., Malik, Y. S., Sharma, K., Kumar, N., Batra, M., Jindal, N., et al. (2013). Molecular evidence of group D rotavirus in commercial broiler chicks in India. Avian BiolRes, 6, 313-316.
Kirkwood, C. D., Palombo, E. A. (1997). Genetic characterization of the rotavirus nonstructural protein, NSP4. Virology, 236, 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1997.8727 PMID: 9325233
Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M. (2013). Fields virology. Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M. (eds.). (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Philadelphia, USA. p. 1347.
Koo, B., Lee, H., Jeon, E., Han, M., Min, K., Lee, S. (2013). Molecular survey of enteric viruses in commercial chicken farms in Korea with a history of enteritis. Poult Sci, 92, 2876-2885. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03280 PMID: 24135590
McNulty, M., Allan, G., Stuart, J. (1978). Rotavirus infection in avian species. Vet Rec, 103, 319-320. PMID: 213873
Mori, Y., Borgan, M. A., Ito, N., Sugiyama, M., Minamoto, N. (2002). Sequential analysis of nonstructural protein NSP4s derived from Group A avian rotaviruses. Virus Res, 89, 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00112-0 PMID: 12367757
Moura-Alvarez, J., Chacon, J. V., Scanavini, L. S., Nuñez, L. F. N., Astolfi-Ferreira, C. S., Jones, R. C., et al. (2013). Enteric viruses in Brazilian turkey flocks: Single and multiple virus infection frequency according to age and clinical signs of intestinal disease. Poult Sci, 92, 945-955. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02849 PMID: 23472018
Nuñez, L. F. N., Ferreira, A. P. (2013). Viral agents related to enteric disease in commercial chicken flocks, with special reference to Latin America. Worlds Poult Sci J, 69, 853-864. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000858
Nuñez, L. F. N., Parra, S. H. S., Astolfi-Ferreira, C. S., Carranza, C., De La Torre, D. I., Pedroso, A. C., et al. (2016). Detection of enteric viruses in pancreas and spleen of broilers with runting-stunting syndrome (RSS). Pesq. Vet Bras, 36, 595-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2016000700006
Otto, P., Liebler-Tenorio, E. M., Elschner, M., Reetz, J., Löhren, U., Diller, R. (2006). Detection of rotaviruses and intestinal lesions in broiler chicks from flocks with runting and stunting syndrome (RSS). Avian Dis, 50, 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1637/7511-020106R.1 PMID: 17039842
Otto, P. H., Ahmed, M. U., Hotzel, H., Machnowska, P., Reetz, J., Roth, B., et al. (2012). Detection of avian rotaviruses of groups A, D, F and G in diseased chickens and turkeys from Europe and Bangladesh. Vet Microbiol, 156, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.001 PMID: 22079218
Pantin-Jackwood, M. J., Day, J. M., Jackwood, M. W., Spackman, E. (2008). Enteric viruses detected by molecular methods in commercial chicken and turkey flocks in the United States between 2005 and 2006. Avian Dis, 52, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1637/8174-111507-Reg.1 PMID: 18646452
Pantin-Jackwood, M. J., Spackman, E., Michael Day, J., Rives, D. (2007). Periodic monitoring of commercial turkeys for enteric viruses indicates continuous presence of astrovirus and rotavirus on the farms. Avian Dis, 51, 674-680. PMID: 17992925
Pauly, M., Oni, O. O., Sausy, A., Owoade, A. A., Adeyefa, C. A. O., Muller, C. P., et al. (2017). Molecular epidemiology of Avian Rotaviruses Group A and D shed by different bird species in Nigeria. Virol J, 14, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0778-5 PMID: 28606119
Roussan, D., Shaheen, I., Khawaldeh, G., Totanji, W., Al-Rifai, R. (2012). Simultaneous detection of astrovirus, rotavirus, reovirus and adenovirus type I in broiler chicken flocks. Pol J Vet Sci, 15, 337-344. PMID: 22844713
Savita, K. A., Malik, Y. Minakshi and Prasad G. (2008). Detection and characterization of group A and D avian rotaviruses in India. Ind J Biotechnol, 7, 554-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.017
Silva, L. C., Sanches, A. A., Gregori, F., Brandão, P. E., Alfieri, A. A., Headley, S. A., et al. (2012). First description of group A rotavirus from fecal samples of ostriches (Struthio camelus). Res Vet Sci, 93, 1066-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.12.007 PMID: 22209018
Trojnar, E., Otto, P., Johne, R. (2009). The first complete genome sequence of a chicken group A rotavirus indicates independent evolution of mammalian and avian strains. Virology, 386, 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.034 PMID: 19246068
Trojnar, E., Otto, P., Roth, B., Reetz, J., Johne, R. (2010). The genome segments of a group D rotavirus possess group A-like conserved termini but encode group-specific proteins. J Virology, 84, 10254-10265. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128%2FJVI.00332-10 PMID: 20631147
Villarreal, L., Uliana, G., Valenzuela, C., Chacón, J., Saidenberg, A., Sanches, A., et al. (2006). Rotavirus detection and isolation from chickens with or without symptoms. Rev. Bras Cienc Avic, 8, 187-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000300009 
Zhang, M., Zeng, C. Q.-Y., Dong, Y., Ball, J. M., Saif, L. J., Morris, A. P., et al. (1998). Mutations in rotavirus nonstructural glycoprotein NSP4 are associated with altered virus virulence. J Virol, 72, 3666-3672. PMID: 9557647